Favor 43%
Oppose 48% http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/27/oreilly-torture/
This was on O'Reilly's own network, yet he seems to be unaware of the actual results. It should be noted that a similar question was asked, but specifically asking if torture were allowed to be used on Osama bin Laden and for that the majority concurred, but that was for one man, not torture in general.
A Washington Post/ABC News Poll asked the question this way:
"Obama has said that under his administration the United States will not use torture as part of the U.S. campaign against terrorism, no matter what the circumstance. Do you support this position not to use torture, or do you think there are cases in which the United States should consider torture against terrorism suspects?"
58% stated that torture should NEVER be used compared to 40% who favored the use of torture.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/01/22/torture/
Also, Gallup conducted a poll and asked the following question:
"Would you be willing -- or not willing -- to have the U.S. government torture suspected terrorists if they may know details about future terrorist attacks against the U.S.?"
Yes 38%
No 56%
http://www.gallup.com/video/20002/Torture-Ban.aspx
Note that unlike Bill O'Reilly, I have cited my sources. So, when Bill O'Reilly states that most Americans favor torture, he is lying. Obviously most Americans do not favor torture, and the polls indicate this quite clearly, yet Bill O'Reilly states the opposite. This is the definition of a lie.
1 comment:
Bill O'Reilly has no use for facts. He only favors opinion, as long as that opinion is his. Incapable of listening, he can only talk. He is "The Bloviator", and is paid well for that.
Turn it around. My childhood was spent learning about the atrocities in torture the US soldier was subjected to by the vile Japanese torturer in WWII. I wonder if a child in the mid-east in 15 years will be hearing similar storied to mine,
The biggest problem with torture is... it doesn't work. Never has, never will.
Of course, why would O'Reilly want to listen to fact, or even reason.
Post a Comment